 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Soto, No. 02-BG-1022,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, January 22, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where an attorney, engaged in the unauthorized practice of law in Maryland, was subject to public disclosure in that state, he was publicly censured in the District of Columbia as reciprocal discipline.
|
|||||
| Ramos v. United States, No. 02-CO-1028,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, January 22, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although defendant's attorneys' allegedly failed to advise him of the possibility that his Maryland probation would be revoked, it did not amount to constitutionally deficient representation and there was no "manifest injustice."
|
|||||
| Suesbury v. Caceres, No. 01-CV-1456,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, January 22, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Action seeking recovery for District of Columbia tort of wrongful disclosure of medical information did not lie against physician who mentioned patient's HIV status to physician in same practice, in context of memo regarding a patient complaint.
|
|||||
| Brown v. Kone, Inc., No. 03-CV-281,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, January 29, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court improperly denied a woman's motion to reinstate her negligence action after it was dismissed for her failure to show up at a medical examination because the Starling factors and a lesser sanction were apparently not considered.
|
|||||
| Cropp v. Williams, No. 03-CV-823,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, January 29, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The District of Columbia Council's appeal from a decision granting a mayor summary judgment in the Council's action seeking to compel the mayor to remove an incumbent inspector general was dismissed as moot because the inspector general had resigned.
|
|||||
| Haidak v. Corso, Nos. 02-CV-892 and 02-CV-925,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, January 29, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where none of patient's proffered medical experts were qualified to testify as to whether surgeon's and hospital's negligence (which jury had found) caused patient's subsequent blindness, verdict for defense was upheld.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
