 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Hallums v. United States, No. 98-CM-1354,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, February 12, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although appellate judges in the District of Columbia disagreed as to its application in the case of an individual shoplifting defendant, the court agreed to recognize a present sense impression exception to the hearsay rule.
|
|||||
| In re Ellis, No. 01-BG-1065,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, February 12, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: After court to which attorney was admitted pro hac vice suspended him indefinitely for not filing appellate brief or record, substantially different discipline of 30-day suspension was warranted in reciprocal discipline case in his home jurisdiction.
|
|||||
| In re Laibstain, No. 02-BG-86, No. 02-BG-70,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, February 12, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: When two attorneys' licenses were revoked in Virginia for misappropriating client funds, disbarment was proper in a reciprocal discipline proceeding, as disbarment was substantially equal to revocation, which was unavailable in District of Columbia.
|
|||||
| In re Patkus, No. 03-BG-802,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, February 12, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where attorney was disbarred for misappropriating minor's funds while serving as guardian, he was not entitled to reinstatement because since disbarment, he had frequently overdrawn his bank accounts and had several outstanding judgments against him.
|
|||||
| Burge v. D.C. Dep't of Empl. Servs., No. 02-AA-547,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, February 19, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The fact that a workers' compensation claimant, a former professional basketball player, chose to pursue other interests after being released from her team, when she had chances to continue playing basketball, was fatal to her lost wages claim.
|
|||||
| In re Te.L., Nos. 02-FS-560, 02-FS-561, 02-FS-562, 02-FS-563, 02-FS-578, 02-FS-615, 02-FS-616, 02-FS-617, 02-FS-630, 02-FS-674, 02-FS-745, 02-FS-746, 02-FS-760, 02-FS-761, 02-FS-773,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, February 19, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District of Columbia court should not have removed children relying on abuse of child who was not their sibling; after statute was amended to include abuse of other children in household, trial court could reconsider issues under amended statute.
|
|||||
| Richardson v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., No. 01-SP-1451, CQL 00-7203,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, February 23, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
