|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
District of Columbia - January 31 - February 2, 2006
|
| |
|
| |
Akassy v. William Penn Apts., L.P., No. 02-CV-141, No. 02-CV-291,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, February 2, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where tenant's violation of consent decree that stayed earlier eviction proceeding was prompted by tenant's challenge to legality of rent increase, under principles of District of Columbia case law, eviction should have been stayed pending outcome of administrative challenge, although landlord was entitled to order protecting its own interest.
|
|
| |
In re Rehberger, No. 98-BG-333,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, February 2, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Finding that an attorney's misdemeanor sexual battery and simple battery convictions under Georgia law were crimes of moral turpitude on the facts, under D.C. Code ??11-2503(a), as such were base, vile, and depraved, as well as contrary to good morals, his disbarment was ordered.
|
|
| |
In re Schoeneman, No. 02-BG-1186,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, February 2, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because an attorney lied and misled his clients and engaged in the practice of law while suspended, he interfered with the administration of justice, in violation of D.C. R. Prof. Conduct 1.1(a), 1.3(a), (b), 1.4(a), 8.4(c), (d), 1.16 (d), and D.C. Ct. App. R. 49(b)(2)(E); thus, the attorney was suspended from the practice of law for four months.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback