Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - District of Columbia - February 19, 2009

  
District of Columbia v. Chambers, No. 07-CV-173, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, February 19, 2009, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: In a personal injury suit, a jury should have been instructed that an officer was on an emergency run, under D.C. Code ? 2-411(4) (2006), because, despite the officer's testimony that she did not think she was responding to an emergency, evidence of the officer's entire pursuit of a vehicle showed she was on an emergency run, as a matter of law.

Search Cases for Free

  
Haywood v. United States, No. 06-CF-772, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, February 19, 2009, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Judgment was affirmed as limitation of defendant's cross-examination of a detective did not violate defendant's Sixth Amendment, U.S. Const. amend. VI, rights. Chapman standard was not applied.

Search Cases for Free

  
Howerton v. United States, Nos. 04-CF-1058 & 06-CO-599, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, February 19, 2009, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's weapons-related convictions under D.C. Code ?? 22-4504(a), 7-2502.01, and 7-2506.01(3) (2001), did not violate his Second Amendment rights because (1) nothing showed that he possessed a gun or ammunition in question for self-defense, and (2) it was not plain that the statutes under which he was convicted were facially unconstitutional.

Search Cases for Free

  
In re Feirman, No. 06-BG-377, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, February 19, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
In re Smith, No. 08-BG-1604, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, February 19, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Leach v. D.C. Police & Firefighters' Ret. & Relief Bd., No. 06-AA-844, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, February 19, 2009, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: The record was insufficient to determine whether the District of Columbia Police and Firefighters' Retirement and Relief Board's finding that a firefighter's back injury did not occur on the job was supported by substantial evidence. The delay in reporting the injury was not substantial evidence tending to disprove the on-duty injury inference.

Search Cases for Free

  
Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth. v. Barksdale-Showell, Nos. 06-CV-1106 & 06-CV-1178, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, February 19, 2009, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Judgment was affirmed as Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority's (WMATA) failure to warn of wet escalator was not quintessentially governmental activity under D.C. Code ? 9-1107.01(80). WMATA's lack of policy underlying its failure to warn was not social, economic, or political decision that was immunized from negligent warning claim.

Search Cases for Free

  
Washington v. United States, No.05-CF-487, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, February 19, 2009, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's drug possession and distribution convictions were reversed because (1) a drug analysis was admitted, under D.C. Code ? 48-905.06 (2001), without its author's testimony, while it was not timely given to defendant, (2) defendant was not allowed to cross-examine the author, and (3) the error was not harmless as to lesser-included crimes.

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top