 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| ABC, Inc. v. D.C. Dep't of Empl. Servs., No. 99-AA-1419,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, May 8, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although a statutory amendment allowed unemployment compensation based on a "lockout," where the union members initiated a work stoppage by going on strike before they were locked out, they were ineligible for unemployment benefits.
|
|||||
| Barnes v. United States, No. 99-CF-809 & 00-CO-1227,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, May 8, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court properly denied a motion for a mistrial where the judge's response to jury questions did not implicate constitutional rights. Denying a motion to contact jurors was proper where the defendant failed to show good cause.
|
|||||
| In re Mitchell, No. 02-BG-772,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, May 8, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney was suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for 90 days based on violations of rules of professional conduct arising from a failure to pay a bill for medical equipment in relation to a personal injury action.
|
|||||
| In re Uwazih, No. 00-PR-1351,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, May 8, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An incapacitated person physically present in the District of Columbia during long-term hospitalization could petition for appointment of a guardian, even though she was not able to prove she was domiciled in the District.
|
|||||
| Jacobson v. Pannu, No. 02-CV-251,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, May 8, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although the alleged malpractice took place in Maryland, where a doctor was mainly a District of Columbia practitioner and the doctor-patient relationship began there, the forum non conveniens motion was properly dismissed.
|
|||||
| Robinson v. Samuel C. Boyd & Son, Inc., No. 99-CV-480,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, May 8, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was appropriate with respect to the real property claims because the resident could not maintain a suit for damages to the real property based on her asserted, but unsupported, life interest in the property.
|
|||||
| Covington & Burling v. Int'l Mktg. & Research, Inc., Civ. No. 01-0004360,
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, CIVIL DIVISION, May 14, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
