 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| McFerguson v. United States, No. 02-CF-632,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, March 31, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in denying defendant's motion to sever filed pursuant to D.C. Super. Ct. R. Crim. P. 8, as the government admitted that the common scheme or plan exception to severance, applied to the circumstances of defendant's case, was incorrect, and the error was not harmless because defendant was prejudiced by it.
|
|||||
| McKenzie v. United States, No. 04-CO-291,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, March 31, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since government conceded that appellant's two concurrent sentences with mandatory minimum terms of 15 years in prison imposed were unauthorized by D.C. Code Ann. ¿ 22-3202(a) (1981), case was remanded so that the trial court could correct the mandatory minimum designation to reflect permissible five-year mandatory minimum term for each offense.
|
|||||
| Psychiatric Inst. v. D.C. Comm'n on Human Rights, Nos. 03-AA-804, 03-AA-825,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, March 31, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A female supervisor's repeated sexual advances toward a homosexual male, which resulted in the male receiving emotional and mental problems, constituted a hostile work environment entitling the male to a large compensatory damages award under the District of Columbia Human Rights Act, D.C. Code Ann. ¿ 2-1401.01 et seq.
|
|||||
| Tucker v. United States, No. 01-CF-1381, F7546-99,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, March 31, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Due process and Sixth Amendment rights were not violated by refusal to release identification witness's grand jury testimony in another case, years earlier, because a mistaken identification did not mean the witness lied, and limitations on cross-examination were within court's discretion. Lesser-included offense instruction was appropriate.
|
|||||
| United States v. Graves, Case No. F 1812-82, F 4914-81,
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, CRIMINAL DIVISION - SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS BRANCH, April 4, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's motion for conditional release under D.C. Code ¿ 24-501(k) was denied because he failed to show that he would not be dangerous as a result of mental illness if released under the conditions proposed. Defendant's motion for correction under D.C. Super. Ct. R. Crim. P. 35 was granted because the structure of the sentence was illegal.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
