|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
District of Columbia - March 12 - March 24, 2009
|
| |
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. Ashland, Inc., No. 07-CV-1004,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, March 12, 2009, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Although company did not initially refer to section of agreement with insurers detailing interest owed on payments capped by another provision of agreement, the interest issue was briefed and argued by parties, was inextricably intertwined with cap issues, and, thus, was within scope of issues submitted to arbitrator that could be decided by him.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
In re Gonzalez, No. 07-BG-104,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, March 19, 2009, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because an attorney did not make a showing necessary to justify a departure from the norm of identical discipline, and because none of the grounds in D.C. Bar R. XI, ? 11(c) was established, the attorney was suspended from the practice of law for 90 days, with reinstatement conditioned on proof of rehabilitation under D.C. Bar R. XI, ? 3(a)(2).
|
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback