Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - District of Columbia - April 7, 2005

  
Abbott v. United States, Nos. 03-CO-492, 03-CO-493, 03-CO-495, 03-CO-496, 03-CO-498, and 03-CO-499, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, April 7, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Pursuant to plea agreement, prosecutor recommended sentence of four years and also asked for "significant period of incarceration"; inmate was sentenced to 17 years. He was not entitled to withdraw guilty plea under D.C. Super. Ct. Crim. R. 32(e) as prosecutor had not breached plea agreement and was entitled to explain her recommendation to court.

Search Cases for Free

  
In re Phillips, No. 03-CV-699, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, April 7, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: An appellate court vacated a trial court's order denying an applicant's request for a name change to "Jesus Christ," because the trial court did not follow the dictates of D.C. Code Ann. ?? 16-2501 through -2503 and erred by denying the request on the ground that the name change may have provoked violent reactions or offended people.

Search Cases for Free

  
In re Wheeler, Nos. 03-BG-736, 04-BG-470 and 04-BG-1014, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, April 7, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Where an attorney was convicted of misapplication of entrusted property in violation of N.J. Stat. Ann. ? 2C:21-15, as that was a crime of moral turpitude per se under D.C. Code Ann. ? 11-2503(a) (2001), his disbarment was mandatory.

Search Cases for Free

  
Lewis v. United States, No. 04-CO-894, No. 04-CO-895, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, April 7, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Where one of three weapons found in a defendant's duffel bag remained loaded and evidence of both defendants' intent to surrender peaceably was at best ambiguous, given their failure to mention such intent to the police, trial court did not err in denying motion to dismiss weapons charges on grounds of D.C. Code Ann. ? 7-2507.05(a) (2001) immunity.

Search Cases for Free

  
Paschall v. D.C. Dep't of Health, No. 03-AA-1347, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, April 7, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Where an ALJ found that a nursing home's notice of discharge to a Medicaid resident was defective for violating federal and District of Columbia law, it erred by later ruling that he lacked authority to order resident's readmission as 42 C.F.R. pt. 483, subpt. E, incorporated by D.C. Mun. Regs. tit. 22, ? 3200.1 (2004), gave ALJs such authority.

Search Cases for Free

  
Roy v. United States, Nos. 02-CF-290 & 02-CF-306, F3590-00 & F3591-00, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, April 7, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: As proximate causation was a valid theory of second-degree murder liability, trial court properly instructed jurors that if they found defendant engaged in a street gun battle where death to a bystander was foreseeable and he did not act in self-defense, they could find that defendant was a "substantial cause" of the bystander's death.

Search Cases for Free

  
Sarete, Inc. v. 1344 U St. Ltd. P'ship, No. 03-CV-1045, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, April 7, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: In a wrongful eviction suit brought by two individual tenants and a corporate tenant, a trial court erred in dismissing the suit as to the individual tenants, pursuant to D.C. Super. Ct. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), because privity of estate existed with the landlord when the landlord waived the lease provisions after an assignment occurred to the tenants.

Search Cases for Free

  
Wilson-Bey v. United States, Nos. 01-CF-293 and 01-CF-633, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, April 7, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendants' convictions for premeditated murder were upheld on appeal because the trial court judge properly instructed the jury that the natural and probable consequence of the act intended standard applied to the case and that an aider and abetter was not required to have the identical intent of the principal.

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top