|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
District of Columbia - March 26, 2009
|
| |
|
| |
Gomez v. Independence Mgmt. of Delaware, Inc., Nos. 05-CV-1487, 05-CV-1488, 05-CV-1489, 05-CV-1490, 05-CV-1491, 05-CV-1492, 05-CV-1493, 05-CV-1494, 05-CV-1495, 05-CV-1496, 05-CV-1497, 05-CV-1498, 05-CV-1499 and 05-CV-1536, 05-CV-1537, 05-CV-1538, 05-CV-1539 and Nos. 06-CV-1150 and 06-CV-1387,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, March 26, 2009, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: A trial court erred by granting summary judgment to an apartment building owner in the tenants' suit asserting a violation of the Rental Housing Conversion and Sale Act, D.C. Code ?? 42-3404.02 through 42-3404.13, as genuine issues of fact existed as to whether the transfer of the property was a sale under D.C. Code ? 42-3404.02(a).
|
|
| |
In re Cole, No. 07-BG-1388,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, March 26, 2009, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: A thirty-day suspension with no probation or practice monitor was proper for an attorney who violated D.C. R. Prof. Conduct 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, and 8.4 because the attorney had no prior disciplinary record, only one client matter was involved, and his actions revealed that he had taken steps to avoid the recurrence of the same situation.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Perez v. United States, Nos. 99-CF-107, 02-CO-1242 & 06-CO-341, Nos. 99-CF-207 & 02-CO-1205, Nos. 99-CF-212, 02-CO-1385 & 06-CO-1164, Nos. 99-CF-226, 02-CO-1253 & 06-CO-1563, Nos. 99-CF-257, 01-CO-1019, 02-CO-1231 & 06-CO-1170,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, March 26, 2009, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: First-degree murder while armed convictions (D.C. Code ?? 22-2401, -3202) were reversed and the cases remanded for convictions for murder in the second degree while armed. Evidence from which the jury could have inferred a defendant had the specific intent to kill a victim and did so with premeditation or deliberation was circumstantial.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback