LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - District of Columbia - June 19 - June 26, 2003

  
Dorsey v. District of Columbia, No. 02-CV-448, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, June 19, 2003, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Injured party's failure to serve the mayor and corporation counsel, when suing the District of Columbia for personal injuries, allowed dismissal, and her failure to explain lack of service of proper parties allowed denial of her motion to reinstate.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Gross v. D.C. Dep't of Empl. Servs., No. 02-AA-658, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, June 19, 2003, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: The Director of the District of Columbia Department of Employment Services relied too heavily on inconsistent findings made by an administrative law judge in concluding that the employee was not employed by the employer at time of the injury.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Porter v. United States, Nos. 97-CF-134, 99-CO-205, 00-CO-1511 & 01-CO-724, No. 97-CF-172, Nos. 97-CF-431, 00-CO-1517 & 01-CO-672, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, June 19, 2003, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Where overwhelming evidence indicated that three defendants planned and executed a drug buy/robbery that turned into a murder, relatively minor errors in prosecutorial conduct and evidentiary rulings were not reversible error.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States-S. Afr. Leadership Exch. Program v. D.C. Dep't of Empl. Servs., No. 00-AA-1467, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, June 24, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Hajimihalis v. Mallios, No. 02-CV-724, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, June 26, 2003, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re A.S., No. 02-FS-198, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, June 26, 2003, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Narcotics seized from defendant, a juvenile, were properly suppressed where a police officer stopped and frisked defendant solely based on his presence at night in a high drug area and his furtive stuffing motion into the waistband of his pants.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
McCullough v. United States, Nos. 99-CF-900 & 99-CF-942, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, June 26, 2003, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: The trial court did not commit reversible by denying defendant's motion for severance from his co-defendant because there was no evidence that defendant's substantial rights were affected.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth. v. D.C. Dep't of Empl. Servs., No. 02-AA-707, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, June 26, 2003, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: An employee satisfied his initial burden regarding the presumption of workers' compensation compensability. The employer failed to present substantial evidence to rebut that presumption, as its expert's opinion was based on a flawed assumption.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.