|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
District of Columbia - April 13 - April 20, 2006
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
In re Scinto, No. 05-BG-430,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, April 13, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because censure in the District of Columbia was the functional equivalent of a reprimand by the Supreme Court of New Jersey, when an attorney was involved in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation in New Jersey in order to obtain illegal rents, pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, ? 9(g)(2), the attorney was publicly censured.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Kreuzer v. George Washington Univ., Nos. 04-CV-1157, 04-CV-1383, 05-CV-42,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, April 13, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: A landowner's judicial admissions that an adjacent owner's building was on its own property, on which a party wall supported the landowner's building, barred trespass claims, and his blockbusting claim, under D.C. Code ? 2-1402.22, was time-barred as principal acts between them were before the limitations period and no later acts were blockbusting.
|
|
| |
Stewart-Veal v. District of Columbia, No. 05-CV-342,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, April 13, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: An alleged injured party's amended negligence complaint claiming alleged negligent hiring, training, and supervision of police officers should not have been dismissed on statute of limitation grounds, but relation back, under D.C. Super. Ct. R. Civ. P. 15(c), did not apply, as intentional tort claims in a first complaint did not survive dismissal.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback