 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| D.C. Dep't of Pub. Works v. Colbert, No. 01-CV-1002,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, May 5, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Remand of case for further proceedings was required; employee appeals board exceeded its proper scope of review in finding employee's misconduct warranted dismissal and considering evidence not presented to the ALJ, while the ALJ erred in excluding evidence of the employee's work history and not remanding case for more complete evaluation.
|
|||||
| In re Hendin, No. 02-BG-717,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, May 5, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Board on Professional Responsibility's recommendation that attorney be disbarred from practice of law in the District of Columbia effective on the date he filed his initial D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit pertaining to disbarred and suspended attorneys was adopted based on his disbarment in New York and lack of exception to the recommendation.
|
|||||
| In re Richardson, No. 04-BG-917,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, May 5, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney was suspended from practicing in District of Columbia. Given the deferential standard of review, the fact that there were no exceptions filed to board of professional responsibility's report and recommendation, and the record of the case, appellate court accepted board's recommendation that it deny attorney's petition for reinstatement.
|
|||||
| Mooring Tax Asset Group, LLC v. Marks, 03-ca-5830(RP),
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, CIVIL DIVISION, May 10, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Rule 65 preliminary injunction was granted where plaintiff was virtually certain to prove that the purported owner of a property that was subject plaintiff's tax certificate did not in fact own the property; the deed that conveyed the property was "signed" by a record owner who had been dead for two years at the time the deed was executed.
|
|||||
| In re Beal, TR No. 2-99,
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, PROBATE DIVISION, May 11, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the trustee of a special needs trust sought an annual commission calculated as one percent of the trust's assets, in addition to attorney's fees, the requested commission would clearly be excessive and unreasonable under D.C. Code Ann. §§ 19-1307.08 because it would exceed the charges which it would replace by a factor of over 25.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
