 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Adams v. Franklin, No. 05-CV-233,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, May 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court issued an order compelling a former attorney for a client to submit to a deposition in litigation subsequently brought by the client; because of the court's order, D.C. R. Prof. Conduct 1.6 did not bar the deposition. Additionally, any claim of attorney-client privilege was waived by a communication by the attorney to third parties.
|
|||||
| Bolanos v. United States, Nos. 98-CF-1821, 98-CF-1871 & 98-CF-1872,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, May 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Convictions for aggravated assault while armed were reversed because the evidence was insufficient regarding the extent of the injuries for two of the victims. Additionally, because the judge failed to properly instruct, the convictions of two defendants for the assault of a third victim were reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
|
|||||
| Higgenbottom v. United States, No. 03-CF-1187,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, May 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Convictions were affirmed because the trial court acted within its discretion when it proceeded with sentencing without holding additional hearings sua sponte on defendant's competency at the time of trial; and, despite an erroneous omission, the self-defense instructions that were given fairly and fully presented the defense theory.
|
|||||
| Kingman Park Civic Ass'n v. Williams, No. 04-CV-954,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, May 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in dismissing and granting summary judgment on civic associations' claims that the District of Columbia Ward Redistricting Amendment Act of 2001, D.C. Code § 1-1041.03, violated the District of Columbia Election Act, D.C. Code § 1-1011.01, as the associations did not show that redrawn wards violated redistricting standards.
|
|||||
| Murphy v. Schwankhaus, No. 05-CV-1486,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, May 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Building owner, as a matter of law, owned no duty to injured party and thus, committed no breach of duty that proximately caused injuries. Injured party presented no evidence tenant's shoveling of sidewalk made it more hazardous; thus, even assuming tenant was owner's agent, there was no evidence owner created risk that was not already present.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
