Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - District of Columbia - May 10, 2007

  
Adams v. Franklin, No. 05-CV-233, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, May 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court issued an order compelling a former attorney for a client to submit to a deposition in litigation subsequently brought by the client; because of the court's order, D.C. R. Prof. Conduct 1.6 did not bar the deposition. Additionally, any claim of attorney-client privilege was waived by a communication by the attorney to third parties.

Search Cases for Free

  
Bolanos v. United States, Nos. 98-CF-1821, 98-CF-1871 & 98-CF-1872, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, May 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Convictions for aggravated assault while armed were reversed because the evidence was insufficient regarding the extent of the injuries for two of the victims. Additionally, because the judge failed to properly instruct, the convictions of two defendants for the assault of a third victim were reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Search Cases for Free

  
Higgenbottom v. United States, No. 03-CF-1187, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, May 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Convictions were affirmed because the trial court acted within its discretion when it proceeded with sentencing without holding additional hearings sua sponte on defendant's competency at the time of trial; and, despite an erroneous omission, the self-defense instructions that were given fairly and fully presented the defense theory.

Search Cases for Free

  
Kingman Park Civic Ass'n v. Williams, No. 04-CV-954, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, May 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court did not err in dismissing and granting summary judgment on civic associations' claims that the District of Columbia Ward Redistricting Amendment Act of 2001, D.C. Code ? 1-1041.03, violated the District of Columbia Election Act, D.C. Code ? 1-1011.01, as the associations did not show that redrawn wards violated redistricting standards.

Search Cases for Free

  
Murphy v. Schwankhaus, No. 05-CV-1486, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, May 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Building owner, as a matter of law, owned no duty to injured party and thus, committed no breach of duty that proximately caused injuries. Injured party presented no evidence tenant's shoveling of sidewalk made it more hazardous; thus, even assuming tenant was owner's agent, there was no evidence owner created risk that was not already present.

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top