LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - District of Columbia - July 17, 2003

  
Dist. Cablevision Ltd. P'shp v. Bassin, Nos. 98-CV-1837 & 98-CV-1838, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, July 17, 2003, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Cable provider violated common law by charging excessive late fees, which made imposition of the fees actionable under the Consumer Protection Procedures Act; cable provider could recoup, however, amount of late fees that were its actual damages.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Howard Univ. v. Lacy, Nos. 02-CV-464 and 02-CV-554, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, July 17, 2003, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: In a wrongful termination suit against a university, offensive collateral estoppel was erroneously applied to the issue of whether the university's handbook was an employment contract, and award of damages for tuition remission was too speculative.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Rolinski v. Lewis, NO. 01-CV-773, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, July 17, 2003, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: An order denying an attorney's motion to dismiss a malpractice claim on grounds of forum non conveniens did not fall within the collateral order doctrine and was not immediately appealable as of right.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.