 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Oler, No. 06-BG-455,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, May 25, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Joiner-Die v. United States, No. 04-CM-1520,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, May 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence supported defendant's convictions for attempted threats to do bodily harm, D.C. Code § 22-407, and intent-to-frighten assault, D.C. Code § 22-404. The convictions did not merge under D.C. Code § 23-112 because each charge required proof of an element that the other did not.
|
|||||
| McDowell v. Southwest Distrib., No. 05-AA-626,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, May 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dismissal of an unemployment benefits claimant's application for an administrative review was reversed and remanded because the record was insufficient for the reviewing court to rule on whether the claimant's application for review was timely filed under D.C. Code § 51-111(b). Thus, an appropriate hearing on the issue was required.
|
|||||
| Norried v. Caribbean Contrs., Inc., No. 05-CV-453,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, May 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's judgment in favor of a home improvement contractor in a breach of contract action by a homeowner was reversed, both as to the complaint and as to the counterclaim, and the case was remanded because the unlicensed contractor was precluded by D.C. Mun. Regs. tit. 16, § 800.1 from accepting payments or asserting its counterclaim.
|
|||||
| Smith v. United States, No. 03-CF-864, No. 03-CF-1012,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, May 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendants' convictions for carrying a pistol without a license in violation of D.C. Code § 22-4504(a) were affirmed as the evidence was sufficient to establish constructive possession of a pistol in the glove compartment of an automobile which one defendant attempted to hide by keeping his knee up against the compartment door to keep it closed.
|
|||||
| Strickland v. Pinder, No. 04-CV-1508,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, May 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a malpractice case, because a decedent's mother, through an expert, failed to establish a national standard of care requiring the administration of additional tests on the decedent, specifically an aortic angiogram using dye or a magnetic resonance imaging exam with contrast material, judgment for defendants as a matter of law was appropriate.
|
|||||
| Teasley v. United States, No. 03-CF-1207,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, May 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court did not err in ruling to admit the contents of two telephone calls under the excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule, as during a call to 911, the complainant spoke in an "excited tone," mumbled to himself, and did not have the wherewithal to provide his license plate number.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
