 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Carleton v. Winter, No. 04-CV-768,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, June 15, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly found for a real estate agent as she did not make a misrepresentation or breach a fiduciary duty to homebuyers by recommending a home inspector. However, because of the possibility that negligence by the inspector amounted to gross negligence, the court erred by finding for the inspector on the buyers' negligence claim.
|
|||||
| Gamble v. United States, Nos. 01-CF-1091, 01-CF-1106, 03-CO-1490, and 03-CO-1569,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, June 15, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's criminal convictions were affirmed because he never made the pretrial challenge necessary to trigger the trial court's obligation to conduct an ineffective assistance of pretrial counsel inquiry, his Fourth Amendment rights were not violated by a stop and frisk search, and he failed to show ineffective assistance of trial counsel.
|
|||||
| Jenkins v. United States, No. 04-CM-1519,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, June 15, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Failure to call witness did not invoke "missing witness" doctrine as witness was not peculiarly available to Government and defendant did not try to call witness. While request for complainant to "come outside" was not explicit threat, reasonable person could interpret words as such in context of shouting and banging on door and prior threat made.
|
|||||
| Reeves v. United States, No. 04-CF-970,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, June 15, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not abuse its discretion in predicting three assault charges would not merge and that therefore, it was inappropriate to dismiss two of three counts of possessing a firearm during commission of a violent crime (PFCV) before trial. While assaults occurred at same location, each was a separate crime for which a PFCV count was proper.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
