District of Columbia, June, 2008, State Case law

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

State Courts - District of Columbia - June 5 - June 12, 2008

In re Reed, No. 07-BG-88, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, June 5, 2008, Decided
View this case - free

Search Cases for Free

In re Wright, Nos. 07-BG-73, 07-BG-74, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, June 5, 2008, Decided
View this case - free

Search Cases for Free

Ivey v. District of Columbia, No. 05-CV-1029, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, June 5, 2008, Decided
View this case - free

Search Cases for Free

N St. Follies, Ltd. P'shp v. D.C. Bd. of Zoning Adjustment, No. 07-AA-362, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, June 5, 2008, Decided
View this case - free

Search Cases for Free

Ramey v. D.C. Dep't of Empl. Servs., No. 06-AA-743, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, June 5, 2008, Decided
View this case - free

Search Cases for Free

Snowder v. District of Columbia, No. 06-CV-959, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, June 5, 2008, Decided
View this case - free

Search Cases for Free

2461 Corp. v. D.C. Alcoholic Bev. Control Bd., No. 06-AA-523, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, June 12, 2008, Decided
View this case - free

Overview: A finding by the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board for the District of Columbia that a restaurant made a substantial change in a restaurant's operations--a change in occupancy--without Board approval under D.C. Code ? 25-762(b)(1) was not supported by substantial evidence, and the Board's sanction against the restaurant was reversed.

Search Cases for Free

Bell v. United States, No. 01-CF-1131, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, June 12, 2008, Decided
View this case - free

Overview: Right to present defense was not violated by failing to require convicted co-defendant to assert Fifth Amendment privilege, question by question; defendant intended to ask him to acknowledge that defendant was not involved and that he committed the crime. Testimony as to involvement would have incriminated him on retrial if appeal was successful.

Search Cases for Free

In re MacDonald, No. 07-BG-321, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, June 12, 2008, Decided
View this case - free

Overview: Because an attorney took no exceptions to the recommendation of the Board of Professional Responsibility that the court impose the functionally equivalent reciprocal discipline of disbarment that was imposed in another state, the presumption in favor of the Board's recommendation was even stronger, and it was adopted by the court.

Search Cases for Free

Kauffman v. Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters, No. 06-CV-1198, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, June 12, 2008, Decided
View this case - free

Overview: Where an at-will employee alleged that his employer breached an agreement to provide him a housing allowance, the employer was entitled to summary judgment because the employee continued his employment after the employer's policy change for a reasonable period during which to consider his personal alternatives; a promissory estoppel claim failed.

Search Cases for Free

Communities Portal