 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| D.C. Metro. Police Dep't v. D.C. Pub. Emple. Rels. Bd., No. 05-CV-675,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, June 29, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District of Columbia Public Employees Relations Board's decision sustaining an arbitrator's award was affirmed because the arbitrator's interpretation of a collective bargaining agreement provision as mandatory and conclusive was not contrary on its face to any law under D.C. Code § 1-605.02(6).
|
|||||
| Dorsey v. United States, No. 04-CM-1287,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, June 29, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for attempted possession of a prohibited weapon (a belt) in violation of D.C. Code § 22-4514 was affirmed. A trier of fact could reasonably find that the belt used to discipline defendant's son was likely to produce great bodily injury and created a substantial risk of protracted loss or impairment of the function of his eye.
|
|||||
| Gaskins v. D.C. Hous. Auth., No. 05-CV-184,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, June 29, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Notice given by a tenant to the District of Columbia Housing Authority (DCHA) was insufficient to satisfy D.C. Code § 6-205(a) by giving DCHA reasonable notice of the tenant's contention that DCHA caused a fatal fire. The notice gave facts about the fire but made no connection between any act by the DCHA and the fire.
|
|||||
| Mattete v. United States, No. 04-CM-409,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, June 29, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Testimony and demonstrations by a sexual abuse claimant as to how defendant ran his hand up her thigh were sufficient to support defendant's misdemeanor sexual abuse conviction under D.C. Code § 22-3006 (2001), and the reviewing court would not presume that the demonstration failed to show a touching of the claimant's inner thigh.
|
|||||
| Savage-El v. United States, No. 03-CF-1300,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, June 29, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for carrying a dangerous weapon outside her home or business in violation of D.C. Code § 22-4504(a) was affirmed because the evidence was sufficient to prove that defendant had carried a spray bottle of gasoline and matches while threatening to injure people. Also, the trial court did not err in instructing the jury.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
