LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - District of Columbia - July 3 - July 10, 2008

  
Clark v. Route, No. 07-CV-40, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, July 3, 2008, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Estenos v. Paho/Who Fed. Credit Union, No. 04-CV-1093, No. 04-CV-1679, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, July 3, 2008, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Hinton v. United States, No. 01-CF-1145, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, July 3, 2008, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re K.P., No. 06-FS-590, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, July 3, 2008, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Schneider, No. 07-BG-885, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, July 3, 2008, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Murphy v. Okeke, No. 04-FM-579, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, July 3, 2008, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
St. James Mut. Homes v. Andrade, No. 01-CV-1371, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, July 3, 2008, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Bernstein Mgmt. Corp. v. D.C. Rental Hous. Comm'n, No. 05-AA-918, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, July 10, 2008, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: The District of Columbia Rent Administrator and Rental Housing Commission had the authority to impose civil fines and treble damages upon a managing agent under the Rental Housing Act of 1985, D.C. Code ¿ 42-3509.01(a) and (b) because the agent acted in bad faith and willfully by charging a tenant rent in excess of the applicable rent ceiling.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Orshansky, No. 04-PR-1317, No. 05-PR-209, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, July 10, 2008, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: The compensation awarded to a special conservator under D.C. Code ¿ 21-2060(a) was affirmed, and the case was remanded to wind up the probate court's involvement in an estate because the appellate court was without jurisdiction to review the appointment of the conservator, and the probate court acted within its discretion in awarding fees.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Martin v. United States, No. 06-CM-1001, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, July 10, 2008, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: A trial court erred in ruling that no search of defendant's house took place when it denied his motion to suppress a firearm that police recovered from his house because the Fourth Amendment was implicated as soon as the police entered the home. Defendant's unequivocal refusal to consent to a search was a clear invocation of his right to privacy.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.