 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Cannon v. United States, No. 00-CF-811,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, December 18, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An officer who searched a car to convert a cell phone to his own use was guilty of theft; the theft conviction automatically precluded a conviction for receiving stolen property, so acquittal on that charge was not an inconsistent verdict.
|
|||||
| In re King, No. 02-BG-1155,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, December 18, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The public censure of the attorney was proper where he was reprimanded by the State of Utah for professional conduct violations and he did not take exception to the Board on Professional Responsibility's recommendation.
|
|||||
| In re Powers, No. 01-BG-36,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, December 18, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An attorney who was suspended from the practice of law in Maryland was subjected to identical reciprocal discipline in the District of Columbia, as the attorney filed no opposition and made no effort to rebut the presumption of reciprocal discipline.
|
|||||
| In re Zackey, No. 01-BG-1387,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, December 18, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court's order to disbar the attorney in the District of Columbia was proper where reciprocal discipline was to be imposed because the attorney did not demonstrate that one of the exceptions to the relevant attorney discipline rule applied.
|
|||||
| Makins v. District of Columbia, No. 02-SP-241,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, December 18, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A finding in favor of the client was proper where the court was unwilling to extend the power of settlement by way of apparent authority to attorneys who attended settlement negotiations under order of the court when their client was not present.
|
|||||
| United States v. Cuffey, Criminal No. F-3044-97,
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, CRIMINAL DIVISION, December 23, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inmate was not entitled to postconviction testing of DNA samples where he could not show any probability new testing would produce evidence to help show his innocence of crime charged. And, as the government noted, such testing and analysis had already been performed, and directly, and explicitly, refuted inmate's theory another committed crime.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
