 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| District of Columbia v. Bender, Nos. 06-TX-255 & 06-TX-294,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, August 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The D.C. Code Enactment Act of 1996, 44 D.C. Reg. 1264 (1997), did not violate the Home Rule Act, D.C. Code § 1-201.01 et seq., by letting the District of Columbia Council impose an unincorporated business franchise tax on nonresident partners' income from a partnership, as it did not change statutes related to the tax, which Congress authorized.
|
|||||
| Goines v. United States, No. 03-CM-883,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, August 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although the trial court erred in admitting evidence of two prior assaults on the complaining witness, the appellate court concluded, under a theory of curative admissibility, that the error was harmless; trial court's verdict did not appear to be swayed by the introduction of evidence of defendant's prior violence towards the complaining witness.
|
|||||
| In re Danilov, No. 06-BG-906,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, August 24, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Fredman, No. 06-BG-493,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, August 24, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Yim, No. 06-BG-404,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, August 24, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An attorney was disbarred after filing an affidavit consenting to disbarment, under D.C. Bar R. XI, § 12, after considering the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility with respect thereto, and a letter from Bar Counsel taking no exception to the report and recommendation.
|
|||||
| Lattisaw v. District of Columbia, No. 04-CV-70,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, August 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Police officer's complaint for defamation and NIED against his employer were properly dismissed. The Comprehensive Merit Personnel Act, D.C. Code § 1-601.01 et seq., provided District of Columbia personnel with their exclusive remedy for personnel issues, including common-law tort claims; thus, a grievance should have been filed with the employer.
|
|||||
| In re I.J., No. 03-FS-671,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, August 25, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
