 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bleck v. Power, No. 07-CV-476,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, September 4, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Former client's legal malpractice action against her former attorney was properly dismissed because the three-year statute of limitations under D.C. Code § 12-301(8) barred the client's claim as the client's injury was realized when the attorney let a two-year period for filing suit under the client's insurance contract elapse without filing suit.
|
|||||
| In re Rust-Tierney, No. 07-BG-732 & 08-BG-562,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, September 4, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Based upon an attorney's guilty plea agreement in Virginia and his affidavit consenting to disbarment, pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 12, 14(g), the attorney was disbarred by consent effective as of the date of his affidavit.
|
|||||
| Jackson v. D.C. Dep't of Empl. Servs., No. 05-AA-1114,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, September 4, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of workers' compensation benefits was vacated and remanded because, pursuant to D.C. Code § 32-1521(1), the record did not support the administrative law judge's conclusion that the treating physician's opinion was misinformed as the treating physician reviewed the employee's complete medical history before forming an opinion.
|
|||||
| Shipkey v. D.C. Dep't of Empl. Servs., No. 06-AA-1308,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, September 4, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of a claim for workers' compensation benefits was reversed and remanded because the Compensation Review Board erred in upholding an incorrect analysis of an employee's claim on the first prong of the localized principally test, interpreting the term "localized principally" incorrectly, and resolving the claim on the third prong of the test.
|
|||||
| David v. United States, No. 99-CM-1741,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, September 5, 2008 *, Decided* The decision in this case was originally issued as an unpublished Memorandum Opinion and Judgment. It is now being published by the court sua sponte.
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment was affirmed as officer's testimony established that defendant assaulted victim under former D.C. Code § 22-504, now D.C. Code § 22-404. Victim's testimony that she was not assaulted and that she told officer she had been hit to get defendant in trouble was impeached. Mere possibility of error did not warrant reversal.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
