 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Alston v. United States, No. 02-CO-1370,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, December 24, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where there was no legal, personal, or other latent obligation between trial counsel and a government witness that would present a conflict of different interests, the trial court properly denied defendant's motion for a new trial.
|
|||||
| Daka, Inc. v. McCrae, Nos. 00-CV-1270, 01-CV-227,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, December 24, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence that, inter alia, harassment was longstanding was sufficient for jury to find employer had knowledge, actual or constructive, well before actions ended. Punitive damages award was excessive as it lacked reasonableness and proportionality.
|
|||||
| Ebron v. United States, No. 99-CF-145, No. 99-CF-273,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, December 24, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Threat evidence was inadmissible against first defendant as there was insufficient foundation; no evidence associated him with spectator actions. Threat evidence was admissible against second defendant as evidence showed knowledge and authorization.
|
|||||
| Mills v. D.C. Dep't of Empl. Servs., No. 02-AA-1223,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, December 24, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where an employee presented substantial evidence that could form the basis for a finding of a wage loss resulting from an "on the job" injury, her petition for temporary total disability benefits should not have been denied.
|
|||||
| Ex parte L. E. K., Adoption Case No. A-408-'99,
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, FAMILY COURT, December 29, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court applied termination of parental rights factors under D.C. Code Ann. ¿ 16-2353(b)(2) to conclude that parents were unreasonably withholding their consent under D.C. Code Ann. ¿ 16-304 for mother's cousin to adopt daughter. Mother had mental health symptoms and religious practices that negatively affected daughter who was thriving with cousin.
|
|||||
| District of Columbia v. Chinn, No. 01-CV-1154,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, December 31, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: If, in case involving intentional use of force by officers, a negligence count is to be submitted to a jury, negligence must be distinctly pled and based upon a factual scenario that presents aspect of negligence apart from use of excessive force.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
