 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Galloway v. Clay, Nos. 04-CV-776 & 04-CV-1002, (CA-1249-03),
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, November 10, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court order denying an attorney's motion for leave to withdraw was immediately appealable under the collateral order doctrine.
|
|||||
| In re Sims, No. 98-BG-1384,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, November 10, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As a hearing examiner for a parking ticket bureau, an attorney's conduct of disposing of at least 20 parking citations issued to himself and his family constituted moral turpitude requiring his disbarment.
|
|||||
| Jacobs v. United States, No. 00-CF-1648,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, November 10, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant was convicted of premeditated murder and two counts of felony murder based on the same killing, his case was remanded to the trial court for it to vacate two of the three murder convictions and for a partial resentencing.
|
|||||
| Hager v. United States, Nos. 01-CF-594 and 01-CF-617,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, November 12, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the court made some errors in its opinion on appeal, it granted appellant's motion for rehearing, but made only cosmetic changes to its opinion and did not make any substantive changes.
|
|||||
| Griffin v. United States, No. 99-CF-1484,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, November 18, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Conviction for obstruction of justice was reversed because the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction; however, conviction for threatening to injure a person was affirmed because the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction.
|
|||||
| In re Dowdey, No. 03-BG-413,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, November 18, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where an attorney was convicted for theft of government property, which was a crime of moral turpitude, the attorney was disbarred.
|
|||||
| United States v. Crockett, Nos. 03-CO-749 & 03-CO-750,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, November 18, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Once sentence had been entered against offender who qualified for young offender sentencing conditions under District of Columbia law, and he was incarcerated outside District, court within District could not order provision of special services.
|
|||||
| In re Barneys, No. 02-BG-1218,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, November 24, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although District of Columbia handled unauthorized practice cases differently from Maryland, no obvious miscarriage of justice would result from imposing reciprocal discipline of disbarment, especially in light of other misconduct by the attorney.
|
|||||
| In re Deutchman, No. 03-BG-997,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, November 24, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The sanction of identical reciprocal discipline in the nature of disbarment was ordered against an attorney who was found to have violated another state's rules of professional conduct with regard to converting client funds.
|
|||||
| Jones v. Williams, No. 03-CV-252,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, November 24, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment dismissing appellant's complaint for failure to exhaust an administrative remedy was reversed and remanded; because appellant was an exempted employee, the Comprehensive Merit Personnel Act had no application to him.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
