 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Muschette v. United States, No. 03-CF-1428,
COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, September 13, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Otts v. United States, Nos. 04-CF-1139 & 06-CO-1040,
COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, September 13, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Shaw v. D.C. Police & Firefighters' Ret. & Relief Bd., No. 02-AA-287,
COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, September 13, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Wallace v. United States, Nos. 04-CF-299 & 05-CO-1328,
COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, September 13, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Warren v. Medlantic Health Group, Inc., No. 05-CV-1282,
COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, September 13, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Brown v. United States, No. 03-CF-777,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, September 20, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Convictions for unlawful distribution of cocaine and unlawful possession of heroin under D.C. Code §§ 48-904.01(a)(1) and 48-904.01(d) were affirmed because the trial court did not abuse his discretion in excluding evidence proffered by defendant that another person actually sold the cocaine to undercover officers as the evidence was irrelevant.
|
|||||
| George Wash. Univ. v. Violand, No. 04-CV-1237,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, September 20, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of employer's postjudgment motion after the jury found for an employee on her claim against her employer for violation of the District of Columbia Human Rights Act was affirmed because the employer waived a statute of limitations defense, and the evidence of unequal pay to the employee on the basis of her gender was sufficient.
|
|||||
| Ransom v. United States, No. 04-CF-316,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, September 20, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Convictions were affirmed because the trial court conducted a sufficient inquiry of the jurors as to any potential bias or impartiality resulting from extraneous information that was unaccountably found in the jury room during jury deliberations and upon finding none did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's request for a mistrial.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
