 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Bland, No. 05-BG-1113,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, December 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney was disbarred in the District of Columbia as reciprocal discipline after he was disbarred in Virginia based on multiple instances of misconduct that revealed a pattern of serious client neglect and lack of competent representation; disbarment was an appropriate sanction and there was no record evidence that would make it inappropriate.
|
|||||
| In re Buffington, No. 06-BG-683,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, December 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney was suspended in a reciprocal disciplinary proceeding from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of six months because his conduct violated D.C. R. Prof. Conduct 5.5(a) and 7.1(a). Further, no exception under D.C. Bar R. XI, § 11(c) applied because there was no miscarriage of justice in the original proceeding.
|
|||||
| In re Granoski, No. 04-BG-868,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, December 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney was suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of 10 days in a reciprocal disciplinary proceeding because discipline was imposed upon the attorney in the State of Florida under a consent agreement in which the attorney admitted to violations of the Florida rules regarding professional conduct.
|
|||||
| In re Robbins, No. 06-BG-575,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, December 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney was publicly censured in a reciprocal disciplinary matter because a public censure was within the range of appropriate sanctions after the attorney was publicly censured by the Supreme Court of Arizona for making a false representation to a trial court in the State of Arizona when seeking an extension of time to answer a complaint.
|
|||||
| Pappas v. E. Sav. Bank, FSB, No. 05-CV-1062,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, December 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment in favor of a mortgagee was affirmed because the appellate court found no defects in the foreclosure sale notices, pursuant to D.C. Code § 42-815(b), and the mortgagee's foreclosure action under a power-of-sale clause in a deed of trust was not a governmental action subject to due process requirements.
|
|||||
| Calloway v. D.C. Hous. Auth., No. 05-CV-330,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, December 8, 2006, Decided n11 The decision in this case was originally released as a Memorandum Opinion and Judgment on December 8, 2006. It is now being published upon motion by appellee.
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment for a housing authority in an action for possession against a tenant was affirmed because the tenant violated her lease as the evidence was sufficient to permit a conclusion by the jury that the tenant had constructively possessed the weapons, ammunition, PCP, and drug paraphernalia found in a police search of the property leased to her.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
