|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
District of Columbia - November 8, 2007
|
| |
Goldschmidt v. Paley, Rothman, Goldstein, Rosenberg & Cooper, Chtd., No. 03-CV-1367, No. 04-CV-240, No. 04-CV-241, No. 04-CV-1118,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, November 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because the trial court's conclusion that a corporate officer's affidavits were not worth the paper they were written on was supported by a factual record replete with examples of his untrustworthiness, the D.C. Super. Ct. R. Civ. P. 60 motion to vacate the bad faith litigation judgment was properly denied.
|
|
| |
Hiligh v. D.C. Dep't of Empl. Servs., No. 06-AA-51, NO. 06-AA-85,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, November 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: The Compensation Review Board properly held, based on legislative history, that the minimum compensation rate of D.C. Code ? 32-1505(c) did not apply to TTD claims. It was error, however, to hold that the rate should be the employee's average weekly wage, as D.C. Code ? 32-1508(2) stated that 66 2/3 percent of average weekly wages should be paid.
|
|
| |
In re Maignan, No. 06-BG-26,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, November 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: As a six-month suspension was within the range of sanctions the court had imposed for similar misconduct involving competence, commingling and misappropriation, disbursing client funds, and interfering with justice, as was found against an attorney in Maryland, the court adopted the Board on Professional Responsibility's recommendation.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|