 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bigelow v. State, Case No. 5D08-573,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIFTH DISTRICT, January 2, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Bojadzijev v. Roanoke Tech. Corp., Case No. 5D08-571,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIFTH DISTRICT, January 2, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a judgment debtor failed to challenge the denial of his motion to vacate a default judgment, and because the debtor waived his right to seek arbitration by failing to raise the issue before the trial court in a timely motion to compel arbitration, his Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.540(b) motion to vacate the default judgment was properly denied.
|
|||||
| Dobzynecki v. State, Case No. 5D08-838,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIFTH DISTRICT, January 2, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Doe v. Presentment of Grand Jury Spring Term 2007, Case No. 5D08-1569,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIFTH DISTRICT, January 2, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Meyer v. State, Case No. 5D08-2573,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIFTH DISTRICT, January 2, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Richardson v. Weatherford, Case No. 5D08-546,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIFTH DISTRICT, January 2, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because there was no basis to conclude that a borrower's principal had a duty to disclose to the lender that the transactions might be usurious, and because the lender could not have reasonably relied on the principal's silence to assume the legality of the transaction, the lender's fraud claim against the principal was properly dismissed.
|
|||||
| Steadman v. State, Case No. 5D08-37,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIFTH DISTRICT, January 2, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Steverson v. State, Case No. 5D08-3933,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIFTH DISTRICT, January 2, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Tavakoly v. Fiddlers Green Ranch of Fla., Inc., Case No. 5D07-3861,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIFTH DISTRICT, January 2, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying a new trial due to the failure of the jury to award damages for future pain and suffering, it erred in denying the wife a new trial on her consortium claim since there was substantial, unrebutted evidence concerning the adverse impact the husband's injury had on the couple's marriage.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
