 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Rohr v. State, Case No. 2D05-5105,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, January 4, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial judge's bare statement that manifest necessity existed for declaration of a mistrial based on defendant's failure to appear on time and possible lie to judge about reason for lateness was insufficient to overcome federal and Florida double jeopardy guarantees; retrial was barred.
|
|||||
| Towers v. Clarendon Nat'l Ins. Co., Case No. 2D05-2620,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, January 4, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court erred in finding that an insured's claim was subject to arbitration; by denying the insured's claim and returning the insured's premium, the insurer voided the contract between the parties, rendering all of the contractual provisions, including the arbitration clause, unenforceable.
|
|||||
| Traughber v. Traughber, Case No. 2D05-1144,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, January 4, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A wife was improperly granted a final domestic violence injunction under Fla. Stat. ch. 741.30 because there was no emergency or potential danger to the wife or the parties' minor children justifying a final hearing on only 12 hours' notice; notice was insufficient, and the husband was entitled to a new final hearing.
|
|||||
| Velazquez v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, No. 4D05-363,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, January 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because an employee's repeated tardiness demonstrated a willful disregard for the employer's interests and fell within the statutory definition of misconduct as outlined in Fla. Stat. § 443.036(29) (2004), the Unemployment Appeals Commission properly affirmed an appeals referee's decision to deny unemployment benefits to the employee.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
