 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Polk County v. Mitchell, Case No. 2D05-1212,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, January 6, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in denying a county's request for a temporary injunction based on a finding that a complaint was required to allege the proposed wording of the injunction requested. There was little dispute about primary text of injunction, which would have prohibited businessman from violating specific county ordinances cited in the complaint.
|
|||||
| Smith v. State, Case No. 5D04-3226,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIFTH DISTRICT, January 6, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Suber v. State, Case No. 5D04-3576,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIFTH DISTRICT, January 6, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Thaden v. State, CASE NO. 1D03-3341,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, January 6, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Werneck v. Worrall, Case No. 5D04-3323,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIFTH DISTRICT, January 6, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since the fact that counsel could have suggested a wholly arbitrary number to the jury did not give counsel carte blanche to mislead the jury by knowingly urging it to employ specious methodology, especially when the trailer owner's assets were part of the equation in a case where punitive damages were not an issue, the matter had to be remanded.
|
|||||
| Womack v. State, CASE NO. 1D05-3231 and 1D05-3233 (Consolidated),
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, January 6, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
