LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Florida - January 7, 2009

  
M.A.M. v. State, Case No. 2D08-5147, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, January 7, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Because a juvenile's detention began running on the day he was first brought into court for a detention hearing; because no motion to continue was filed by the State and no adjudicatory hearing was commenced, pursuant to §§ 985.255(2) and 985.26(2), Fla. Stat. (2008), the juvenile was entitled to habeas corpus relief and to be released on day 21.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Marckman v. State, Case No. 2D08-1689, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, January 7, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Milian v. State, No. 3D08-3147, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, January 7, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Miran v. State, Case No. 2D07-4533, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, January 7, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Petit-Dos v. Sch. Bd. of Broward County, No. 4D07-2534, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, January 7, 2009, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: When a student was struck by a truck after exiting a school bus, it was not error to include the truck driver on the verdict form under § 768.81, Fla. Stat. The conduct of the truck driver, who was speeding to flee police, was not substantially certain to result in injury to the student and thus did not meet the definition of an intentional tort.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Rule v. State, Case No. 2D07-3821, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, January 7, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Sanders v. State, No. 3D08-3097, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, January 7, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
St. Joseph's Hosp., Inc. v. Cintron, Case Nos. 2D08-1965, 2D08-2261 CONSOLIDATED, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, January 7, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Davis, No. 3D07-1396, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, January 7, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Torres v. State, No. 4D05-2706, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, January 7, 2009, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Expert's testimony was not subject to Frye, and was properly admitted because it was pure opinion. Expert did not rely on scientific studies, syndrome evidence, or any other classic scientific test. He limited the basis for his testimony to his own professional experience and did not render an opinion relating to the victim in this case.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.