 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Rogers v. State, Case No. 5D04-4040,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIFTH DISTRICT, January 13, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The appellate court lacked jurisdiction to review the denial of defendant's motion to modify his probation because an order denying a defendant's motion to modify probation was not an appealable order pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.140.
|
|||||
| Thomas v. State, Case No. 2D04-2858,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, January 13, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the trial court lacked authority to alter a coterminous sentence originally imposed, and thereby increase the amount of time that defendant would serve, it erred in granting the State's motion to correct said sentence. Moreover, the resulting increased sentence violated defendant's double jeopardy rights.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
