Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - Florida - January 16, 2008
	Tedford v. State, No. 4D06-1936, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, January 16, 2008, Decided View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	United States Dev., Ltd. v. Jones College, Nos. 3D06-1518, 3D06-1221, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, January 16, 2008, Opinion Filed View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Velazquez v. State, Case No. 2D07-1414, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, January 16, 2008, Opinion Filed View this case - free   Overview: Denial of the Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850 motion for plea withdrawal was error as the postconviction court failed to address the totality of the circumstances, and the record attachments to its order were insufficient to refute defendants claim. He was not required to allege a "viable" defense in order to state a facially sufficient claim for relief. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Whittlesey v. Whittlesey, Case No. 2D06-5220, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, January 16, 2008, Opinion Filed View this case - free   Overview: In an action for attorney's fees arising out of dissolution of marriage proceedings, because the trial court's determination of entitlement to attorney's fees and costs was based on a now reversed equitable distribution scheme, the trial court's determination of entitlement to fees also had to be reversed. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us   Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.