 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| McDonald v. Okeelanta Corp., No. 4D05-188,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, January 18, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| McGraw v. State, Case No. 2D05-3687,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, January 18, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence stated a cognizable claim because existing precedent indicated that a fine constituted an illegal sentence because the habitual felony offender statute, Fla. Stat. ch. 775.084, did not specifically allow for the fine imposed on appellant under Fla. Stat. ch. 893.135(1)(b)(1).
|
|||||
| Metro Bldg. Materials Corp. v. Republic Nat'l Bank, CASE NO. 3D03-407 & 3D03-1797,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, January 18, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Counterclaims asserting that a bank breached oral agreements to renew and increase the accounts receivable loan at issue in a lawsuit were barred by Fla. Stat. § 687.0304. Submitting a completed credit application did not constitute full performance on the signor's side and did not take the transaction out of the statute of frauds.
|
|||||
| Moore v. State, CASE NO. 3D04-693,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, January 18, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Orta v. State, CASE NO. 3D04-2692,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, January 18, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court improperly denied a request for defendant's presence under Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.180(a)(9) at a hearing on his motion to correct an illegal sentence because it did not involve only a "ministerial act" of sentence correction but involved the correction and recalculation of a score sheet, resulting in a reduced sentencing range.
|
|||||
| Palm Beach Polo, Inc. v. Vill. of Wellington, No. 4D04-2839,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, January 18, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Developer was properly held to its obligation to preserve a section of pristine forest land within a planned unit development with the developer's predecessor in title, it was not entitled to compensation under Fla. Stat. § 70.001, and a town's redesignation of this area as a conservation area did not alter this obligation.
|
|||||
| Robinson v. State, No. 4D04-4454,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, January 18, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Rosenbaum v. City of Miami, CASE NO. 3D05-493,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, January 18, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Rotella v. State, CASE NO. 3D05-1638,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, January 18, 2006, Opinion filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
