 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Hall v. State, CASE NO. 1D06-5202,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, January 24, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Harrell v. Harrell, No. 4D06-66,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, January 24, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Himes v. Schnably-Vickers, CASE NO. 1D06-2777,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, January 24, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hodges v. State, No. 4D06-1802,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, January 24, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Indian Trail Improvement Dist. v. Dep't of Cmty. Affairs, No. 4D05-4379,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, January 24, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Department of Community Affairs was within its power to designate a county as the service provider of freshwater and wastewater to the unincorporated portions therein. Further, an independent special district had standing to object to the same based on the reasonably foreseeable future operational and planning consequences from said action.
|
|||||
| J.L.S. v. State, No. 3D05-2604,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, January 24, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As the purpose of § 810.0975(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2005), which prohibited trespassing in a school safety zone, was to protect school children -- a legitimate and compelling purpose -- and the geographical and temporal restrictions it imposed bore a rational relation to its purpose, it did not violate substantive due process.
|
|||||
| Johnson v. State, No. 3D06-1353,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, January 24, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Jones v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals, No. 3D06-2001,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, January 24, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Kahan v. Sheptoff, No. 4D06-767,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, January 24, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
