 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Aircraft Logistics, Inc. v. H. E. Sutton Forwarding Co., LLC, No. 3D07-3196,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, January 21, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly considered existence of duty on summary judgment because whether duty and foreseeability existed was a question of law. Summary judgment was upheld because ramp owner owed no duty to plane owner; sudden wind gusts were not foreseeable, ramp could not have been secured to avoid damage, and airport had sole control of ramp.
|
|||||
| C.C.N. v. State, Case No. 2D08-639,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, January 21, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| City of Hollywood v. Benoit, No. 4D08-1312,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, January 21, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Circuit court properly issued writ of rule nisi under § 440.24(1), Fla. Stat. ordering an employer to pay workers' compensation benefits pursuant to stipulated order as circuit court had limited jurisdiction and could not address legal issue of whether providing attendant care to claimant was a condition precedent to his mother's receiving payment.
|
|||||
| Espinal v. State, No. 3D07-1887,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, January 21, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Fonseca v. State, No. 3D08-2940,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, January 21, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| French v. French, No. 4D06-3860,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, January 21, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Alimony payments to a former wife should have been reduced or terminated because once the trial court had found that the wife was involved in a supportive relationship with her paramour under § 61.14(1)(b)(1), Fla. Stat., it had no choice but to reduce or terminate the alimony.
|
|||||
| Gelin v. State, No. 3D08-2884,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, January 21, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Gordon v. State, CASE NO. 1D07-4136,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, January 21, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Revocation of probation was upheld because drug evidence seized during probationary search was correctly used to determine whether defendant had violated probation. Conviction on new drug charges was reversed; use of that drug evidence did not support new prosecution--anonymous phone tip did not provide reasonable suspicion of criminal activity.
|
|||||
| Gunn v. State, No. 4D08-3728,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, January 21, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
