 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Kelley v. State, No. SC08-608, No. SC08-1083,
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA, January 22, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: It was proper to deny an inmate's Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.851 successive postconviction petition because an evidentiary hearing was not warranted on his Brady claim. There was no Brady violation when evidence disposition forms were neither favorable nor material to the inmate, and the State's failure to disclose them did not prejudice the inmate.
|
|||||
| Nixon v. State, No. SC07-953,
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA, January 22, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Murder conviction and death sentence were upheld; defendant did not meet § 921.137 Fla. Stat. definition of mental retardation, and once his IQ was found to be above 70, there was no obligation to consider remaining statutory factors. Definition was constitutional, and Equal Protection Clause did not require extension of Atkins to the mentally ill.
|
|||||
| Parker v. State, No. SC06-2176,
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA, January 22, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was entitled to new penalty phase hearing; counsel failed to investigate and present mitigating childhood and mental health evidence. Uncontroverted evidence that he had a type of neuropsychological impairment that affected executive brain functions was available, but was not presented, and would have qualified as nonstatutory mitigation.
|
|||||
| Mickens v. Damron, Case No. 2D08-658,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, January 23, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Rivera v. State, Case No. 2D08-974,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, January 23, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Siminski v. State, Case No. 2D07-5692,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, January 23, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
