 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Petition of Doe, Case No. 2D07-5975,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, January 23, 2008, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the appellate court was evenly divided on the disposition of a minor's motion for a waiver of the parental notice of the termination of her pregnancy, pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.331(a), a panel decision denying the motion stood, and the motion for rehearing en banc was denied.
|
|||||
| Jenkins v. Lennar Corp., No. 3D07-1858,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, January 23, 2008, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment in favor of defendants in mortgagor's third attempt to relitigate a final judgment of foreclosure was proper as each of mortgagor's claims--that she was improperly evicted, that a corporation filed a fraudulent IRS form 1099, and that a clerk of the court made erroneous docket entry--were barred under the doctrine of res judicata.
|
|||||
| Kapila v. At&T Wireless Servs., No. 3D06-2462,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, January 23, 2008, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An award of attorney's fees to a wireless telephone service for its defense of state antitrust claims that had been dropped by a trustee for a dealer of the service was error where other claims remained pending, such that it was unclear which would be the "substantially prevailing party" under the parties' agreement for purposes of fee recovery.
|
|||||
| Larrain v. Bengal Motor Co. Ltd., No. 3D07-132,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, January 23, 2008, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Leyva v. State, No. 3D05-1641,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, January 23, 2008, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Lloyd's Underwriters at London v. El-Ad Villagio Condo. Ass'n, No. 4D07-3876,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, January 23, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Logreira v. State, No. 3D07-2911,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, January 23, 2008, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Malone v. State, No. 4D07-1113,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, January 23, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's attempt at a direct appeal of her sentence on a grand theft conviction failed; direct appeals of sentences were limited by ¿ 921.002(1)(h), Fla. Stat., there was no case law support for the direct appeal, and the appellate court found no constitutional violation that would make defendant's sentence appealable.
|
|||||
| Mason v. State, No. 3D07-1529,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, January 23, 2008, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
