 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Reid v. State, No. 4D06-3745,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, January 23, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Roberson v. St. Johns County Sch. Bd., CASE NO. 1D06-5839,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, January 23, 2008, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employer/carrier (E/C) was estopped from asserting a statute of limitations defense to a workers' compensation claimant's petition for benefits (PFB) because the E/C failed to inform the claimant that her 0% impairment rating had changed to 10%, and based on the original rating, the claimant chose to forego filing the PFB.
|
|||||
| Robinson v. State, Case No. 2D06-2351,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, January 23, 2008, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Rodriguez v. Lagomasino, No. 3D06-1956,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, January 23, 2008, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As a trial court erred in denying a motorist's motion to strike two jurors for cause in the motorist's personal injury action against a driver, arising from a vehicle collision, a new trial was required; in response to additional questioning on certain issues, the jurors did not appear rehabilitated.
|
|||||
| Ross v. State, Case No. 2D06-1350,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, January 23, 2008, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not reversibly err in admitting: the victim's identification testimony through the testifying detective, as said admission came with the indicia of reliability similar to that contemplated by § 90.801(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2004); and prior inconsistent statements by defendant's cohorts, as such rebutted an implication of fabrication.
|
|||||
| Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. v. Cox, No. 3D07-1515,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, January 23, 2008, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Shocki v. Aresty, No. 3D07-1134,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, January 23, 2008, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although townhome neighbors were involved in friction that resulted in various incidents, a trial court's issuance of a final injunction for protection against repeat violence, based on §§ 784.046 and 784.048, Fla. Stat. (2007), was error, as the trial court considered additional unpled incidents in one party's closing arguments.
|
|||||
| Smith v. State, No. 4D07-4152,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, January 23, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the trial court did not have jurisdiction more than three years after the original adjudication to withhold adjudication, and because defendant did not qualify for a withhold of adjudication, his Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.800(a) motion for postconviction relief was properly denied.
|
|||||
| Smith v. State, No. 3D07-1957,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, January 23, 2008, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
