 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Fla. Pub. Emples. Council 79 v. State, CASE NO.: 1D04-5066,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, January 24, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Public Employees Relations Commission erred in dismissing the union's unfair labor practice charge, as Fla. Admin. Code Ann. r. 60K-17.004(3)(g) regarding layoffs remained valid during the applicable time governing the unfair labor practice charge at issue even though the legislature intended to repeal it later.
|
|||||
| Kiser v. State, CASE NO. 1D04-5645,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, January 24, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since, even if defense counsel had been informed of defendant pretrial oral statement during discovery, as required by Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.220(b)(1)(C), the exact same trial preparation and strategy would have been used, the failure of the State to disclose a statement to defense counsel was harmless error.
|
|||||
| McNair v. State, CASE NO. 1D05-3647,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, January 24, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court improperly summarily denied as successive defendant's motion, filed pursuant to Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.800(a), alleging that his habitual offender sentence was illegal on the ground that one of the predicate convictions was committed after the offense at issue, because the record did not conclusively refute defendant's claim.
|
|||||
| Peters v. State, CASE NO. 1D04-2642,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, January 24, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since written laboratory reports from independent labs setting forth the results of drug tests were admissible in community supervision revocation proceedings where a certification and/or declaration of authenticity as business record pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 90.803(6) was used, defendant's constitutional right to confrontation was not violated.
|
|||||
| State v. Burke, CASE NO.: SC05-1173,
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA, January 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Sun Seekers Homeowners' Ass'n v. Walton County, CASE NO. 1D05-1497,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, January 24, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Wakeman v. Dixon, CASE NO. 1D05-0103,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, January 24, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in dismissing with prejudice first domestic partner's amended complaint seeking to enforce several agreements with second domestic partner regarding rights pertaining to two minor children born to second domestic partner; it did not have power to grant custody or compel visitation by a person who was not a natural parent.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
