 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| BMS Enters., LLC v. City of Fort Lauderdale, No. 4D04-4543,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, January 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Two orders issued by the circuit court reviewing by certiorari a city's refusal to approve plans to build a self-storage facility on commercial property near a railroad were quashed; the circuit court erred in finding that the city had the discretion to deny an application to build a self-storage facility within 60 feet of a railroad right-of-way.
|
|||||
| Caroline St. Ptnrs, LLC v. Bowers, CASE NO.: 3D05-2238 CONSOLIDATED: 3D05-2237,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, January 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Carter v. State, No. 4D05-4447,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, January 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Carver v. Niedermayer, No. 4D04-2381,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, January 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court abused its discretion in limiting counsel's questioning of prospective jurors to a total of 30 minutes because there was no showing that counsel's questioning during time allotted was repetitive or cumulative, and the trial court's limitation operated to deprive counsel of a fair opportunity to identify prospective jurors for challenge.
|
|||||
| Colucci v. Kar Kare Auto. Group, Inc., Nos. 4D05-1759 & 4D05-2148,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, January 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A corporation did not have a legitimate business interest upon which to base a valid covenant not to compete as no Florida customers were included on the customer list purchased under the agreement. Because there was no valid covenant not to compete, the corporation could not prove the necessary elements of a temporary injunction.
|
|||||
| Cooper v. State, No. 4D05-3860,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, January 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Craig v. State, CASE NO. 3D04-125,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, January 25, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Delgado v. State, CASE NO. 3D04-522,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, January 25, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Evans v. Tradestation Group, Inc., No. 4D04-3287,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, January 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court erred in granting the former employer's motion for summary judgment because the issue of whether the former employee was entitled to be paid for not competing could not be properly resolved by summary judgment where the parties' contract did not preclude the employee from being paid to work for a company he formed.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
