 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| McCray v. State, CASE NO. 1D05-1167,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, January 26, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: It was not harmless error for trial court to prevent defendant from allowing one witness to refresh recollection by viewing police report and to exclude evidence of victim's mother's very different description of a stalker, originally given to police, where such use for impeachment, pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 90.801, did not violate hearsay rule.
|
|||||
| Valdes v. Galco Constr., CASE NO. 1D04-4193,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, January 26, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Preparing to meet an insurer's allegations in a workers' compensation case naturally related to the criminal matter in the sense of helping to meet the same allegations in the criminal information. Thus, the trial court erred in ordering a downward departure as attorney fees were appropriately awarded pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 440.34.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
