Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - Florida - January 30, 2008
	Ventura v. State, No. 3D05-872, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, January 30, 2008, Opinion Filed View this case - free   Overview: Given the overwhelming evidence of guilt, and absent a contemporaneous objection to a detective's comment on defendant's silence, no harmful error resulted from the otherwise improper testimony. Further, documentary evidence was properly admitted in support of defendant's sentence, pursuant to § 90.803(8), Fla. Stat. (2005). Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	White v. State, No. 4D06-3027, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, January 30, 2008, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Victim's testimony that he had a wallet on his person before several persons attacked him, and officer's testimony that victim had no wallet when he was found, was insufficient to convict defendant of robbery, § 812.13 Fla. Stat. (2004)), as victim's memory of assault was hazy and wallet could have fallen out of his pocket as he was being dragged. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Williams v. Primerano, No. 4D07-1710, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, January 30, 2008, Decided View this case - free   Overview: A mother was denied due process of law by the trial court's determination that the father would be the primary residential parent of the parties' child. The father had requested a child pick-up order, not a determination of primary physical residence. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us   Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.