 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ayala v. State, Case Nos. 5D05-109, 5D05-3693,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIFTH DISTRICT, February 1, 2008, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Bailey v. State, Case No. 2D05-1697,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, February 1, 2008, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Everhart v. Everhart, Case No. 5D06-4315,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIFTH DISTRICT, February 1, 2008, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a former husband was improperly charged twice for the amount he used as a down payment on a family business, and because the former wife should not have been "credited" with payment of two debts that had been fully satisfied either by the former husband or by monies from the family business, the trial court overvalued the family business.
|
|||||
| Ferrentino v. State, Case No. 2D07-2148,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, February 1, 2008, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because possession of a firearm by a convicted felon under ¿ 790.23, Fla. Stat. (1991) did not authorize imposition of a fine, and because the discretionary fine provision of ¿ 775.083, Fla. Stat. (1991) was not available as an additional sanction when defendant was sentenced as a habitual felony offender, imposition of a $ 50,000 fine was illegal.
|
|||||
| Malarkey v. State, Case No. 2D06-5240,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, February 1, 2008, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Maxwell v. State, Case No. 5D07-2085,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIFTH DISTRICT, February 1, 2008, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| McWherter v. Smith, Case No. 2D06-3263,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, February 1, 2008, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Nails v. State, Case No. 5D07-2325,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIFTH DISTRICT, February 1, 2008, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: After finding that defendant's attack on an habitual felony classification lacked merit, and because defendant's repeated pro se filings were clogging the already-strained judicial resources, upon his failure to show cause, the court ordered any future pleadings to be summarily denied unless filed by a member in good standing of the Florida bar.
|
|||||
| Rivera v. State, Case No. 2D07-246,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, February 1, 2008, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
