 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| A.J.N. v. State, No. SC05-1322,
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA, February 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| A.N.R. v. State, No. SC05-1343,
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA, February 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| B.J.H. v. State, No. SC05-1825,
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA, February 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| B.W.H. v. State, No. SC05-1291,
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA, February 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Brockney v. Centel Cellular Co. of Ft. Walton Beach Ltd. P'ship, CASE NO. 1D05-4168,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, February 8, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Property owner was entitled to summary judgment in a negligence action brought by the personal representative of the decedent because the owner did not interfere with the work of an independent contractor for whom the decedent worked, nor was it responsible for a cable a neighbor's employee placed across a road where the decedent was injured.
|
|||||
| C.C. v. State, No. SC05-1556,
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA, February 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| C.M. ex rel. A.A. v. Dep't of Children & Families, CASE NO. 1D05-5351,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, February 8, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: While clear and convincing evidence was presented that the father's paternal rights were to be terminated under §§ 39.806(1)(b), 39.806(1)(d)(1), 39.806(1)(d)(3), 39.806(1)(f), and 39.810, Fla. Stat., the case was remanded for a determination as to whether the child's manifest best interests allowed her placement for adoption by a paternal aunt.
|
|||||
| D.W.A. v. State, No. SC05-1731,
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA, February 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| E.G. v. State, No. SC05-1553,
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA, February 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
