LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Florida - February 6, 2008

  
Daniels v. State, No. 3D07-311, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, February 6, 2008, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Dep't of Revenue ex rel. Jackson v. Nesbitt, Nos. 4D06-4322, 4D06-4323 & 4D07-574, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, February 6, 2008, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Because the trial court lacked the authority to order the Department of Revenue (DOR) to take action to remove the federally mandated passport restrictions imposed against a father, as ¿ 409.2564(10), Florida Statutes (2006), granted DOR the authority in this area when the combined arrearage exceeded $ 2,500, the trial court's order was reversed.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Egwuatu v. S. Lubes, Inc., CASE NO. 1D07-0977, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, February 6, 2008, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Denial of class certification was affirmed because the court did not abuse its discretion in ruling that a customer did not establish the class certification prerequisites under Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.220 as individualized differences existed among the customers of a company that allegedly violated the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Ellison v. State, No. 4D07-4023, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, February 6, 2008, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
F.S. v. State, No. 3D07-1629, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, February 6, 2008, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Guardian Ad Litem Program v. Times Publ'g Co., Case No. 2D07-4673, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, February 6, 2008, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Hammer Constr. Corp. v. George Phillips & Assocs., No. 3D07-336, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, February 6, 2008, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Subcontractor was awarded damages on certain claims against a general contractor because the subcontractor was entitled to payment for the roof work it did on building repairs for the contractor, but the subcontractor was not awarded damages on other claims because it performed defective work and the contractor was entitled to setoff.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Hampton v. State, Case No. 2D06-3990, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, February 6, 2008, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Hill v. State, Case No. 2D06-5235, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, February 6, 2008, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's conviction for trespassing and the revocation of his probation were reversed. The only evidence pointing to defendant as the culprit was the circumstance that his fingerprints were found at the crime scene, and the State failed to show that the prints could only have been made at the time of the crime.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Isham v. State, No. 4D07-4920, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, February 6, 2008, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.