Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - Florida - February 9, 2007
	A.S. v. State, Case No. 5D05-4200, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIFTH DISTRICT, February 9, 2007, Opinion Filed View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Barrett v. Barrett, Case No. 5D05-2520, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIFTH DISTRICT, February 9, 2007, Opinion Filed View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Burton v. State, Case No. 2D06-3665, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, February 9, 2007, Opinion Filed View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Butler v. State, Case No. 5D06-2885, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIFTH DISTRICT, February 9, 2007, Opinion Filed View this case - free   Overview: Because an order prohibiting an inmate from filing future pro se Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.800(a) motions deprived the inmate of the notice and an opportunity to be heard, its recommendation that the inmate's gain time be forfeited as a sanction for filing successive pleadings; therefore, the order was reversed and remanded for an order to show cause. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Carmona v. McKinley, Ittersagen, Gunderson & Berntsson, P.A., Case Nos. 2D06-1850, 2D06-1852, 2D06-1854 CONSOLIDATED, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, February 9, 2007, Opinion Filed View this case - free   Overview: In deciding motion to dismiss under Fla. R. Civ. P.1.140(b)(6), it was improper for trial court to consider, and presumably agree with, lawyers' argument, which was not corroborated on faces of complaints, that they were not proper parties to lien foreclosure suit because they had no interest in the real property, but only posted security bond. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Coukos-Semmel v. Mitchell (In re Estate of Coukos), Case No. 2D06-2327, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, February 9, 2007, Opinion Filed View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	G.T. v. State, Case No. 2D05-679, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, February 9, 2007, Opinion Filed View this case - free   Overview: Although trial court informed juvenile appellant of his right to counsel, it failed to make a thorough inquiry into appellant's comprehension of the offer of counsel as required by Fla. R. Juv. P. 8.165(b)(2). Merely informing appellant of role of counsel and asking if he understood that he was giving up his right to counsel was insufficient. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Gonzalez v. State, Case No. 5D05-2834, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIFTH DISTRICT, February 9, 2007, Opinion Filed View this case - free   Overview: While the trial court properly upheld the constitutionality of both §§ 812.019(1) and 812.012(8), Fla. Stat., rejecting defendant's overbreadth challenge, a restitution award in the amount of $ 4,000 was reversed, as the record supported an award of $ 3,125 at best. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Haines City HMA, Inc. v. Carter, Case No. 2D06-1413, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, February 9, 2007, Opinion Filed View this case - free   Overview: Because the trial court erred in using a multiplier to enhance a contingent attorney's fee award to an employee in her suit filed under the anti-retaliation provision of the Florida Civil Rights Act, contrary to federal precedent, the award was reversed, and the case was remanded for entry of an award reflecting only the lodestar amount. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Johnson v. State, Case No. 5D06-2852, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIFTH DISTRICT, February 9, 2007, Opinion Filed View this case - free   Overview: Because an inmate's third Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.800(a) motion contained the same assertion that was made in his first and second motions, and because vindictive sentencing claims were not cognizable in a Rule 3.800(a) proceeding, the trial court properly summarily denied the third motion; the inmate was precluded from making future pro se filings. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us   CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.