 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Montgomery v. State, Case No. 2D07-5403,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, February 6, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not sufficiently determine whether defendant facing probation revocation and prison sentences voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently discharged counsel; it needed to conduct adequate Nelson hearing to ascertain reason for request and Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.111(d) Faretta hearing to advise him of the dangers of self-representation.
|
|||||
| Rosado v. Daimlerchrysler Fin. Servs. Trust, Case No. 2D07-3690,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, February 6, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because ¿ 324.021(9)(b)(2), Fla. Stat., did not compel lessor of car to have certain insurance standards, ¿ 324.021(9)(b)(2) did not impose liability for failure to meet those optional standards. Court certified to supreme court a question of great public important: Does Graves Amendment, 49 U.S.C.S. ¿ 30106, preempt ¿ 324.021(9)(b)(1), Fla. Stat?
|
|||||
| State Farm Fla. Ins. Co. v. Ehrich, Case No. 2D08-788,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, February 6, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| White v. White, Case No. 2D07-5013,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, February 6, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment was reversed as wife did not plead or raise unclean hands defense to reduction of her permanent periodic alimony award under ¿ 61.14(1)(b)(1), Fla. Stat. in pretrial motion, and waived it under Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.140 and Fla. Fam. L.R.P. 12.140. As husband timely objected, unclean hands defense was not tried by consent.
|
|||||
| Williams v. State, Case No. 2D07-4215,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, February 6, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
