Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - Florida - February 2, 2006
	Childers v. State, CASE NO. 1D03-2154, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, February 2, 2006, Opinion Filed View this case - free   Overview: In a county commissioner's trial, because prejudice to the State by admission of a notice to revoke a witness's plea agreement substantially outweighed its very limited probative value, the notice was excludable under Fla. Stat. § 90.403, and the county could be considered a "victim" entitled to restitution under Fla. Stat. § 775.089(1)(a). Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Fla. Bar v. Hagendorf, No. SC04-859, SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA, February 2, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Overview: State supreme court was not required to impose same two-month suspension that the Nevada Bar imposed on the attorney for misconduct in Nevada; imposition of a two-year suspension in Florida based on Nevada misconduct had a basis in existing case law and standards, and similar lengthy suspensions had been imposed for nearly identical misconduct. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Penalver v. State, No. SC00-1602, SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA, February 2, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Defendant was convicted of first-degree murder and was sentenced to death. As there was scant direct evidence establishing his guilt, the cumulative effect of the trial court's evidentiary errors, especially its admission of evidence tending to suggest that defendant tampered with a witness and suborned perjury, mandated a new trial. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	State v. Steele, CASE NO.: SC04-802, SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA, February 2, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us   CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.