 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Finklea v. State, CASE NO.: 1D04-0983,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, February 3, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court abused its discretion in refusing to give a complete reinstruction on the crime of possession; the portion of the instruction given likely confused jurors as to the distinction between "possess" and "possession." By reading a partial instruction, the trial court left out the "knowledge" portion of the definition of unlawful possession.
|
|||||
| Granberry v. State, Case No. 5D05-2764,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIFTH DISTRICT, February 3, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since the appellate court concluded that the appellate counsel's failure to argue that the erroneous jury instruction on justifiable use of force amounted to fundamental error and constituted ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, defendant's petition for a belated appeal, claiming ineffective assistance of appellate counsel was granted.
|
|||||
| Hale v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, CASE NO. 1D05-1428,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, February 3, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hayward v. State, CASE NO. 5D05-1410,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIFTH DISTRICT, February 3, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since it was clear that defendant would have accepted his plea without an expectation of receiving gain time as he was advised to "presume the worst" and "count on the full sentence" with no gain time award, he was not entitled to relief under Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850 based on counsel failing to inform him that he would not be eligible for gain time.
|
|||||
| Hernandez v. State, Case No. 5D04-2467,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIFTH DISTRICT, February 3, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since defendant challenged whether all of the substance introduced at trial was actually cannabis, and the jury instruction did not require a finding of the amount of cannabis, the instruction as to the essential elements of Fla. Stat. §§ 777.04(3), 893.03(1)(c)(7) and 893.135(1)(a), and, thus, constituted fundamental error.
|
|||||
| Hodges v. State, Case No. 2D04-4807,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, February 3, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Entry of plea of nolo contendere to a subsequent charged offense, without an entry of conviction thereon, was insufficient basis for revoking probation and adjudicating guilt on underlying offense; probationer who contested guilt of subsequent offense should have been provided opportunity to argue her side of the case.
|
|||||
| Jenkins v. Campbell, CASE NO. 1D06-0302,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, February 3, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Manning v. Tunnell, CASE NO.: 1D04-0416,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, February 3, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Parramore v. Crosby, CASE NO. 1D05-2164,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, February 3, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
